您现在的位置: 纽约时报中英文网 >> 纽约时报中英文版 >> 观点 >> 正文

那些想长生不老的男性

更新时间:2018-2-4 10:14:16 来源:纽约时报中文网 作者:佚名

The Men Who Want to Live Forever
那些想长生不老的男性

Would you like to live forever? Some billionaires, already invincible in every other way, have decided that they also deserve not to die. Today several biotech companies, fueled by Silicon Valley fortunes, are devoted to “life extension” — or as some put it, to solving “the problem of death.”

你想长生不老吗?一些在其他方方面面都不可战胜的亿万富翁认为,他们也不应该死去。如今,多家生物科技公司在硅谷财富的推动下致力于“延长寿命”,用一些人的话来说就是解决“死亡问题”。

It’s a cause championed by the tech billionaire Peter Thiel, the TED Talk darling Aubrey de Gray, Google’s billion-dollar Calico longevity lab and investment by Amazon’s Jeff Bezos. The National Academy of Medicine, an independent group, recently dedicated funding to “end aging forever.”

这项事业得到了科技亿万富翁彼得·蒂尔(Peter Thiel) 、TED演讲(TED Talk)的宠儿奥布里·德·格里(Aubrey de Grey)、谷歌(Google)投资10亿美元的Calico长寿实验室和亚马逊(Amazon)杰夫·贝佐斯(Jeff Bezos)的投资的支持。独立机构美国国家医学院(National Academy of Medicine)最近出资,希望“永远结束衰老”。

As the longevity entrepreneur Arram Sabeti told The New Yorker: “The proposition that we can live forever is obvious. It doesn’t violate the laws of physics, so we can achieve it.” Of all the slightly creepy aspects to this trend, the strangest is the least noticed: The people publicly championing life extension are mainly men.

致力于长寿的企业家阿拉姆·萨贝提(Arram Sabeti)对《纽约客》(The New Yorker)说:“我们可以长生不老的主张显而易见。它并不违反物理定律,所以我们能够实现它。”在这一潮流之中,有些方面略微有点瘆人,而最奇怪的恰恰是最不受人关注的一点:公开支持延长寿命的主要是男性。

Not all of them, of course. In 2009, Elizabeth Blackburn received the Nobel Prize for her work on telomeres, protein caps on chromosomes that may be a key to understanding aging. Cynthia Kenyon, the vice president for aging research at Calico, studied life extension long before it was cool; her former protégée, Laura Deming, now runs a venture capital fund for the cause. But these women are focused on curbing age-related pathology, a concept about as controversial as cancer research. They do not appear thirsty for the Fountain of Youth.

当然,不能一概而论。2009年,伊丽莎白·布莱克本(Elizabeth Blackburn)因染色体终端研究获诺贝尔奖。染色体终端是染色体上的蛋白质末端,它可能是了解衰老的关键。Calico实验室负责衰老研究的副主任辛西娅·凯尼恩(Cynthia Kenyon)早在这个领域火起来之前就开始研究延长寿命了。劳拉·戴明(Laura Deming)曾是凯尼恩的门生,目前经营着一家面向该领域的风险投资基金。但这些女性侧重的是抑制与衰老有关的病理,这个概念的争议性和癌症研究大致相当。她们对青春不老泉似乎并不渴望。

Professor Blackburn’s new book on telomeres couldn’t be clearer. “Does our research show that by maintaining your telomeres you will live into your hundreds?” it says. “No. Everyone’s cells become old and eventually we die.” Ms. Kenyon once described her research’s goal as “to just have a healthy life and then turn out the lights.” Even Ms. Deming, a 23-year-old prodigy who worked in Ms. Kenyon’s lab at age 12, points out that “aging is innately important to us.”

布莱克本有关染色体终端的新书说得再清楚不过了。“我们的研究是否表明可以通过保养染色体终端活到几百岁?”书中写道。“没有。所有人的细胞都会衰老。最终我们都会死去。”凯尼恩曾说她的研究目标“只是活得健健康康,然后关上所有的灯”。甚至连23岁的戴明也指出,“衰老对我们具有天然的重要意义。”她曾是一个天才儿童,12岁就在凯尼恩的实验室工作。

Few of these experts come close to matching the gaudy statements of the longevity investor and “biohacker” Dave Asprey, who has told journalists, “I decided that I was just not going to die.” Or those of Brian Hanley, a microbiologist who has tested an anti-aging gene therapy he developed on himself, who claimed: “There’s a bunch of things that will need to be done to achieve life spans into at least hundreds of years. But we’ll get there.” Or of the 74-year-old fashion mogul Peter Nygard, who during a promotional clip receives injections of his own stem cells to reverse his aging while declaring: “Ponce de León had the right idea. He was just too early. That was then. This is now.”

这些专家的话远远比不上长寿投资人兼“生物黑客”戴维·阿斯普雷(Dave Asprey)、微生物学家布莱恩·汉利(Brian Hanley)和服装大亨彼得·尼加德(Peter Nygard)的夸张言论。阿斯普雷曾对记者表示,“我断定我不会死。”汉利对自己研发的一个抗衰老基因疗法进行了检测,宣称:“要实现寿命延长到至少几百岁,有很多事情要做。但我们会实现的。”现年74岁的尼加德则在一条宣传片中接受注射自己的干细胞,以此扭转衰老趋势,并宣称:“庞塞·德莱昂(Ponce de León,文艺复兴时期西班牙探险家,传闻在美洲发现了青春不老泉。——编注)的想法是对的。只是太早了。此一时也,彼一时也。”

I came across Mr. Nygard’s ode to human endurance three years ago while beginning research on a novel about a woman who can’t die, and watching that video allowed me to experience something close to life extension. As Mr. Nygard compared himself to Leonardo da Vinci and Benjamin Franklin while dancing with a bevy of models — or as a voice-over explained, “living a life most can only dream of” — nine minutes of YouTube expanded into a vapid eternity, where time melted into a vortex of solipsism.

我在三年前偶然看到了尼加德对人类耐久程度的这曲颂歌。当时,我刚开始研究一部小说,它描写了一个不会死去的女子。观看那段视频让我得以经历一种接近生命延长的体验。尼加德在片中把自己比作莱昂纳多·达·芬奇(Leonardo da Vinci)和本杰明·富兰克林(Benjamin Franklin),同时又和一群模特共舞——或者就像画外音解释的那样,“过着大部分人只能梦想的生活”,这段9分钟的YouTube视频演变为一种索然无味的永恒。时间融化成一个唯我独尊的漩涡。

At that time I was immersed in caring for my four young children, and this paean to everlasting youth seemed especially stupid. I recall thinking that if this was eternal life, death didn’t seem that bad.

彼时,我正专注于照顾四个年幼的孩子,这首为永葆青春献上的赞歌看上去特别愚蠢。我记得自己当时想,如果这就是永生的话,死亡似乎也没那么糟糕。

But now, as powerful men have begun falling like dominoes under accusations of sexual assault, that video with its young women clustered around an elderly multimillionaire has haunted me anew. As I recall my discomfort with the proclamations of longevity-driven men who hope to achieve “escape velocity,” I think of the astonishing hubris of the Harvey Weinsteins of the world, those who saw young women’s bodies as theirs for the taking.

但是现在,当有权势的男性开始因性侵指控而纷纷倒下时,年轻女性聚集在一个上了年纪的千万富翁周围的视频又开始萦绕在我心头。当我回想起那些希望实现“逃离速度”、追求长寿的男性的宣言让我感到多么不适时,我想起了世界上所有跟哈维·韦恩斯坦(Harvey Weinsteins)相似的男性令人惊讶的傲慢,他们认为年轻女性的身体是供他们享用的东西。

Much has been said about why we allowed such behavior to go unchecked. What has remained unsaid, because it is so obvious, is what would make someone so shameless in the first place: These people believed they were invincible. They saw their own bodies as entirely theirs and other people’s bodies as at their disposal; apparently nothing in their lives led them to believe otherwise.

关于我们为什么会任由这种行为发生,人们已经谈论了很多。有一个因为太过明显而未被谈及的问题是,某些人为什么会如此无耻:他们认为自己是不可战胜的。他们认为自己的身体完全属于自己,而他人的身体是供他们享用的,显然,他们的生活中没什么能让他们产生相反的看法。

Historically, this is a mistake that few women would make, because until very recently, the physical experience of being a woman entailed exactly the opposite — and not only because women have to hold their keys in self-defense while walking through parking lots at night. It’s only very recently that women have widely participated in public life, but it’s even more recently that men have been welcome, or even expected, to provide physical care for vulnerable people.

从历史上看,几乎没有哪个女性会犯这个错误,因为在仅在不久之前,作为女性的身体体验恰好与之相反——这不仅是因为女性在夜间穿过停车场时,必须随时准备自卫。直到最近,女性才广泛参与公共生活,而由男性来护理身体虚弱者的情况则是到了更近的时期才受到欢迎,甚至在人们的期望之中。

Only for a nanosecond of human history have men even slightly shared what was once exclusively a woman’s burden: the relentless daily labor of caring for another person’s body, the life-preserving work of cleaning feces and vomit, the constant cycle of cooking and feeding and blanketing and bathing, whether for the young, the ill or the old. For nearly as long as there have been humans, being a female human has meant a daily nonoptional immersion in the fragility of human life and the endless effort required to sustain it.

在人类历史的长河中,只是在最近极其短暂的时间里,男性才开始分享曾经完全落在女性身上的负担:永无休止的日常劳作,照顾另一个人的身体;进行清洗粪便和呕吐物等维护身体的工作;做饭、喂饭、穿衣、洗澡的不断循环;照顾幼儿、患者或老年人。几乎从人类诞生开始,身为女性就意味着,每天别无选择地沉浸在人类生命的脆弱之中,以及维持它所需的无尽劳动之中。

Obviously not everyone who provides care for others is a saint. But engaging in that daily devotion, or even living with its expectation, has enormous potential to change a person. It forces one to constantly imagine the world from someone else’s point of view: Is he hungry? Maybe she’s tired. Is his back hurting him? What is she trying to say?

显然,不是每一个照顾他人的人都是圣人,但做出这样的日常奉献,哪怕只是满足他人的这种期望,都非常可能改变一个人。它迫使一个人不断地从他人的角度去想像这个世界:他饿了吗?她可能累了。他的背还疼吗?她想说什么?

The most obvious cure for today’s gender inequities is to put more women in power. But if we really hope to create an equal society, we will also need more men to care for the powerless — more women in the boardroom, but also more men at the nurses’ station and the changing table, immersed in daily physical empathy. If that sounds like an evolutionary impossibility, well, it doesn’t violate the laws of physics, so we can achieve it. It is surely worth at least as much investment as defeating death.

对于当今的性别不平等现象,最明显的疗法是让更多女性掌权。但是,如果我们真的希望创造一个平等的社会,我们还需要让更多男性去照顾没有力量的人——让更多的女性加入董事会,也让更多的男性去做护士、换尿布,专注于日常的身体同理心中。这听起来可能像是不可能出现的进化,但它并不违反物理定律,所以我们能够实现它。它的确需要获得至少和战胜死亡一样多的投资。

Perhaps it takes the promise of immortality to inspire the self-absorbed to invest in unsexy work like Alzheimer’s research. If so, we may all one day bless the inane death-defiance as a means to a worthy end.

也许只有获得永生的希望能激励那些只关心自己的人在老年痴呆症等不怎么性感的工作上投资。如果是这样的话,我们也许终有一天会祝福对抗死亡的愚蠢努力,因为它可能会成为一种手段,最终会带来有价值的结果。

But men who hope to live forever might pause on their eternal journey to consider the frightening void at invincibility’s core. Death is the ultimate vulnerability. It is the moment when all of us must confront exactly what so many women have known all too well: You are a body, only a body, and nothing more.

但是,那些希望永生的人可以在自己的永恒之旅上暂停一下,思考不可战胜的核心之中可怕的空虚。死亡是终极的脆弱。在这个时刻,我们所有人都必须面对很多女性熟知的一点:你是一个身体,只是一个身体,仅此而已。

“全文请访问纽约时报中文网,本文发表于纽约时报中文网(http://cn.nytimes.com),版权归纽约时报公司所有。任何单位及个人未经许可,不得擅自转载或翻译。订阅纽约时报中文网新闻电邮:http://nytcn.me/subscription/”

相关文章列表